“The existence of a Creator and Controller God has always been at the core of all religions and in fact central to the very psyche of humans “, declared my friend Devjani with an air of apparent finality, “till this foul science came along and challenged it “. She was quoting from a respected columnist and waved the newspaper at us as it’s irrefutable proof!
The debates between Science and Religion, Fate and Free Will, Duty and Destiny were staple conversations in our morning tea sessions. Sparks flew and sometimes the tone even got personal. But that day, it took a really serious turn. Satya, my friend and IT guru, was in no mood to take all these. He had always regarded Devjani as the quintessential woman, prone to rituals and superstitions despite her acclaimed background in Medicine. Satya was a cold rationalist for who reason reigned supreme everywhere.
Priyambada, never the one to be interested in such heavy topics, was less concerned about the impending storm over our tea cups. She always held the role of a moderator and stopped such bouts just before the combatants threatened to inflict lasting injuries upon one other. It was, after all, her house and she had to take good care of it before any such hot discussions attempted to blow it up. She inhaled the drifting aroma of morning tea and winked at me as the combatants got ready to lock horns.
Devjani was a votary of God, Spirituality and all those good things we are supposed to be. Even though she was a doctor, she had a streak of obedience and conformity to the traditions. For her, Satya symbolized an unemotional, machine like boring personality with no respect to tradition and authority – something which no one should ever be. She particularly disliked those moments during tea session when Satya would read the Science Page of the daily newspaper aloud and made all tea club member to listen to him. Today, with the views of such a celebrated columnist on a top national daily, she wanted to pay Satya back in his own coin – with compound interest!
But Satya, instead of getting agitated at such a blasphemous declaration (blasphemy ?), smiled benevolently. He sensed an easy kill, perhaps. Taking a sip from his cup, he rubbed his hands and told “ Devjani, it is time you brushed up your “Science”, “History” and “Religion” early morning. If you haven’t, allow me the opportunity to do so, madam! “
With this he stood up , surveyed the audience imperiously as Hercule Poirot does, in the final chapter of an Agatha Christie Novel before declaring the murderer’s name and posed us the following question ..
Which of the great persons could have told the following?
“Gripped by fear people go to sacred mountains, sacred groves, sacred trees and shrines. Religious ideas, especially the idea of God, has its origin in fear.”
a. Bertrand Russell b. Stephen Hawking c. Pope John d. Paul-II e. Buddha
“Of course Bertrand Russell “, shouted Priyambada.
“No way”, thundered Satya.
“Makes the job rather easier for me”- quipped Devjani. It has to be Stephen Hawking, that silly scientist who had the audacity to declare that the goal in his life was to make God redundant as a hypothesis for understanding the origin of the universe. What other derogatory remarks would he not have passed with his evil mouth, had he not been afflicted with that strange neurodegenerative disorder, only he knows! “
“Wrong again” thundered Satya. “It is Buddha – as quoted in Sukta 188 of Dhamm Pada, the main religious text for the Budhhists. So you see, here is a religion, well before the birth of Christ and long before science as we know came along, which not only questioned the existence of a God but even went to explain why such a concept persisted in the contemporary belief system .“
“Want to know more? Why Buddha told so?” Satya queried. “He actually noticed that people turn to God, in times of stress, sadness and uncertainty- out of fear and to feel assured that God will help them. The real reason for origin of sadness is desire. Buddha taught us to try to understand our fears, to lessen our desires and to calmly but courageously accept the things we cannot change. He replaced fear, not with the irrational belief of God but with a rational understanding of our strength and limitation. It is a tragedy that the birth place of such a rational revolutionary – India - today teems with Godmen, Soothsayers and Astrologers, all peddling their dangerous ware to a gullible public whose mind is far away from the concept their Buddha had preached!”
Reeling under such a blow, lesser mortals would have finished their tea and signed the peace treaty. But Devjani was made of sterner stuff. She was not to be so easily undone.
“Yes, Satya, we know that Buddhism is an exceptional case of agnostic religion. But all other religions do have a God as their core belief and have never questioned his existence and his role in creating and still controlling their world! Nobody ever challenged that! This in turn validates mine as well as this columnist’s claim.”
Satya’s grin grew wider. He expected such a salvo from the enemy camp. But it was probably his day and not Devjani’s. He delivered his knockout punch in style –
“Oh yes. Buddha was agnostic! He was an exception! Can I then refer to Hinduism, please? Lets than talk about our good old Rig Veda and its famous “Nasadiya Sukta, or the Hymn of Creation”. Let me tell you just four verses of possibly the mother of all mysterious hymns which has captivated even modern rationalists and scientists “
He took another sip from the already cold tea kept on the sofa side and tried to remember some thing. We thought he was probably slipping into an unchartered territory this time and did not have enough ammunition in his arsenal.
But we were wrong. In crisp Sanskrit, Satya started reciting what he called the Nasadiya Sukta, his tone faltering at times with suspected devotion:
न मर्त्युरासीदम्र्तं न तर्हि न रात्र्या अह्न आसीत्प्रकेतः आनीदवातं सवधया तदेकं तस्माद्धान्यन न परः किं चनास
“Let me not translate them for you. I will let the great German Philosopher, Max Mueller, do that for you. I want the exact translation so that you can appreciate as to why these are not ordinary mantras.
Death was not then, nor was there aught immortal:
Why are they so enigmatic ?
Think ! What are” not non-existent” and “nor existent” ? Why should Rig Vedic poets or philosophers think of such riddles? What purpose does it serve?
Or does it sound a little like Black Holes? You can not see them as the escape velocity from them reaches speed of light. So neither light nor any other form of information can escape them. They are invisible, non-existent for all practical purposes ! Yet they exist. And influence others by the tremendous gravitational force exuded from their huge mass. They are “cosmic nothings” made up of “huge things”, created when large stars die after their nuclear fuels runs out!
Solid matter - contained in star clusters, galaxies and black holes that we have around - is actually very rare in our universe. Matter floats in the universe like cosmic dust particles with immense expanse of nothingness separating them. So much rare is matter that the average matter-density of observable universe is just one hydrogen atom in every four cubic meter volume. (Lucky that we have so much matter around us on earth!). But recent scientific observation has concluded that what seems like empty space among the floating galaxies is actually not empty. It is filled with mysterious “dark matter “ and “dark energy” which account for most of the observable universe and explains the force behind its rapid accelerated expansion. This seemingly “non-existent” dark matter and energy really account for the “existent” ones , their motion and position. They also hold the secrets of understanding what happened during creation of Universe .
And what about death? Was it there? Of course not! Death, as we know it, of complex organic cells generated by the coded messages of DNA , was initially not there. That arose long after billions and billions of chance combination of atoms led to the fortuitous birth of self replicating molecule .! But then there was no immortality either. New stars were being born and old stars died and collapsed into white dwarfs or super novae. Planets arose around some stars. The cosmic dance birth and death, of stars and galaxies continued. And somewhere in the cosmos, clusters of inorganic molecules became self-replicating and in some cases ,as in the case of humans, self-conscious! “
“Seems like a heavy does of philosophy? Wait till I get to the next two verses” , chuckled Satya.
“ It gets even more intriguing there “
Satya went on , encouraged probably by our undivided attention .
“ These two verses have generated great debates over years – from religious leaders to quantum physicists . Cornel University Astronomy professor, Carl Sagan often quoted this mysterious sukta to prove that a spirit of “doubt” persisted even among the most ancient societies and rues the fact that even today, many of us do not have such a spirit of rational enquiry!”
“One more round of tea ? For deeper soul searching?” , asked Priyambada and nobody dared to disagree! “
“Ideal to dispel the philosophical fog hanging in the air “, I interjected.
Satya was not listening. He had relapsed into his trade mark monologue. Tea or not, there was no way to bring him back to reality immediately.
“Do you want to know what I personally think of these two verse s.”. Said Satya.
“Yes, Yes go on, we are all ears for you!” , I encouraged him to speak , for his own theories were often made of bizarre stuff ,- ranging from the banal to the bewildering !
Satya did not need my encouragement. He had already started.
“ I think they ( the verses ) declare the boundary of human knowledge and announce a limitation to its capability . You see, can humans know everything by using their brain? Or is there something which can never be known to them, no matter however much they tried through a system “reason , logic and observation”. In other words, is there an upper limit to the application of knowledge ? Is there something absolutely unknowable for ever? Is there something which will forever remain uncertain”
“How could that be ?” I asked and went on to prove that I also knew a bit of modern science to participate! “Why should there be an upper limit? By application of their “mind” human beings have achieved so much! They have even transcended and augmented the limits of their god –given senses. They can listen to ultrasound and see infra-red. They can see beneath their bodies by sending invisible rays and converting them into printable images which can be interpreted by their natural eyes . They can set up powerful radio telescopes to detect feeble signals from exploding stars in deep space, magnify them and create visible maps. They can literally listen to the dolphins and whales who talk in sound waves with frequencies undetectable to human ears. They seem to go on and on in their victorious march on nature . With the help of a soft 1.5 kg of bloated, wired mass called “brain” , sitting on top of their erect bodies, this strange specie have been able to contemplate on the abstract subject of infinity , visualize great distance in our cosmos and comprehend the behaviour of the tiniest entities inhabiting the sub atomic quantum world. They may be mere mortals, yet they are self-conscious and are able to do one thing that no other species does – “ contemplate on the fact of their own contemplation” . If they still don’t know something, that is because of the fact that their latest knowledge tool “science” has not yet got enough time since it’s invention. Why therefore should there be any uncertainty? I think, the Rig Vedic fellows were merely kidding !” , I said in one breadth and having the satisfaction of defeating Satya in his home turf .
Devjani, who thought I was on her side, gave me a glance laced with a you-too –Brutus accusation.
“Sorry to disappoint you My friend” , said Satya, “ Much as I would wish human knowledge to be a winner all the way right up to the end , it actually is not . “
“Let me tell you an interesting story. As the 20th century dawned mathematicians of the world gathered in the second ever “ World Congress” on Mathematics in Paris. Its opening address was by a German Mathematician called David Hilbert. His speech has since been regarded as the most famous and most influential speech in mathematics. That was a time when science was riding on the wheels of mathematics and mankind was waking upto its combined potential. Great discoveries tumbled out one by one from the European Laboratories. Scientific optimism was on the air! But certain mathematical problems remain unsolved and some mathematical conjectures appeared true but unproven. Hilbert was of the view that key to all human understanding lies in mathematics, the language of the universe. He singled out 23 unproven problems and declared that their solution will define the course of 20th century mathematics. Everybody agreed that there must be some way to prove them. Nothing is improvable by human intellect. So the final declaration of this great congress was “We must know, we will know”.
But within a few years, a sickly looking Austrian mathematician destroyed the second part of this triumphant declaration for ever. His name was Kurt Godel and what he invented sent shivers down the spine of mathematician, logicians and thinkers of al hue around the world. For what he proved was a theorem which states that “there will always be something improvable”. Proving that something will always remain improvable to any system of logic was exactly opposite to Hilbert’s futuristic claim , “We will know”. According to Gödel, there really is something about which we can never be certain about whether it is true or false , right or wrong ! Sounds eerily similar to the last lines of “Nasadiya sukta” , isn’t it ? Godel called this “incompleteness theorem” , others called the “The God Principle “. Here at last is the final frontier for human knowledge. Religious leaders and theologians, wary of a marauding Science, heaved a sigh of relief realizing that here was a proof that humans could never be omniscient, thanks largely to Godel. But God did not help Godel, who turned increasingly delusional at later life, refused to take food as he saw unseen enemies poisoning him and died a lonely death in a psychiatric hospital at Princeton . His best and only friend with whom he daily walked from his apartment to college and back , watched helplessly . Thus died the greatest ever logician of all time about whom Einstein had once remarked “I have no more interest in my works on Relativity. These days, I go to the college, merely for the privilege of walking back with Gödel”
Just when the news was out the “unknowable” really exists, albeit mathematically, another young mind, the German Physicist Heisenberg noticed something strange about the nature of the subatomic particle- one can not tell the position and speed of a particle simultaneously no matter how sophisticated instruments you employ. If you know one exactly, the other one is uncertain and vice-versa. It is as if, uncertainty is woven into the very fabric of nature. It is as if there is a real world within “is and isn’t”, “right and wrong” and “existent and non-existent”. Humans have to accept this seemingly unreal nature of reality and the uncertain behaviour of the micro-particles which constitute the certain , ready to touch macro-world! Heisenberg called it this “the uncertainty principle”. Unlike Godel who had to flee Europe to avoid persecution, Heisenberg received a Nobel and was made the Director of Nazi atomic bomb project by Hitler!
So where does that leave us. Today’s science knows about the existence of the non-existent and the certainty of the uncertain in the universe . Dozens of quantum mechanical and relativistic experiments testify to it on almost daily basis. “
“Just as the ancients mused in the last four line of the Nasadiya Sukta, replied Devjani.
It was close to 9.30 AM.
Satya glanced at his watch, gave a shriek and rushed out. It was time for him to go to office and push his pen in the highly certain world of Indian Babudom !
